Movie
Review: Walk on Water
By
William Sternman
-------------------------------------
Walk
on Water
Starring Lior Ashkenazi, Knut Berger, and Caroline Peters
Written by Gal Uchovsky
Directed by Eytan Fox
Where
does it all end?
In
Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra, the horrified Roman general
gives the queen of Egypt an exasperated answer:
Do
you hear? These knockers at your gate are also believers in vengeance
and in stabbing. You have slain their leader: it is right that they
shall slay you. If you doubt it, ask your four counselors here. And
then in the name of that right, shall I not slay them for murdering
their Queen, and be slain in my turn by their countrymen as the invader
of their fatherland? Can Rome do less then than slay these slayers
too, to show the world how Rome avenges her sons and her honor? And
so, to the end of history, murder shall breed murder, always in the
name of right and honor and peace, until the gods are tired of blood
and create a race that can understand.
What
Shaw doesn’t consider is what happens to a nation that is obsessed
with revenge and to the dehumanized instruments it uses to execute its
judgments.
Surely,
there must come a time when the emotional need to settle the score dies
down, becoming instead a mindlessly observed ritual performed by indifferent
acolytes a generation or two removed from the original offense. Surely,
there must come a time when a nation is better served looking to the
future than brooding over the unchangeable past.
Surely, if that nation is Israel, it must be guided by the religious
principles on which it was founded. “Vengeance is mine,”
saith the Lord. And, “Thou shalt not murder.”
But
cafeteria believers are always free to pick and choose among various
Biblical strictures. As one wag pointed out to one of the world’s
most egregious religious grazers, the gay-bashing Dr. Laura Schlessinger:“I
would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as it suggests in Exodus
21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for
her?” Not to mention: “I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching
the skin of a dead pig makes men unclean, but may I still play football
if I wear gloves?”
Walking
on Water, an Israeli movie, does not consider these questions either.
Its
“hero” is Eyal (Lior Ashkenazi), a cold-blooded, stony-faced
assassin who mechanically disposes of a Hamas agent while the man is
on an outing with his wife and child. The child cries at the death of
his father. Eyal is unmoved.
When
Eyal comes home, he finds that his wife, Iris, has killed herself. (Talk
about your heavy-handed coincidences!) She leaves a suicide note, whose
contents are held back until an appropriately melodramatic turning point.
But I won’t force you to sit through the entire movie to find
out what it says. Iris has killed herself because everything Eyal touches
smells of death. She certainly knows how to prove her point, but to
what purpose? (And what do you do for an encore?)
Eyal
sets out on his next mission: to find and murder a former Nazi officer.
It
is sixty years since the fall of the Third Reich, and the hunted monster
is now a pathetic and doddering old man in his nineties. He cannot even
walk on his own and he is barely kept alive by a variety of mechanical
devices. He is more dead than alive, and a diabolic revenge on him might
have been to just let him suffer on, rather than mercifully put him
out of his misery. But revenge demands action; the subtlety of inaction
is lost on the avenging angel. How can he prove he has done something
if he has done nothing?
It
is at this point that the writers (Gal Uchovsky et al.) and director
(Eytan Fox) pull a series of surprise twists out of their cocked hats.
The trouble with these surprises, however, is that while they are as
unexpected as practical jokes (“Hey, lady, you dropped something.
April fool!”), they are also just as unconnected to what has gone
before. Soon there are so many dei ex machina being lowered
from the sky that their baskets threaten to collide.
The
surprise twists are supposed to resolve the action, but they do no such
thing. So, as writers and directors often do when they’ve painted
themselves into a dramatic corner (I call it the “desperation
ending”), they tie everything up with an incredible happily-ever-after
conclusion. Even the stony-faced killer is seen laughing as though he
had never killed a fly, let alone a human being.
And,
oh, yes, thanks to the Nazi’s gay grandson (Knut Berger), Eyal
learns to overcome his super-macho distaste for “homos.”
If only character transformations were as easy in real life as they
are in the movies, psychiatrists would be selling apples on street corners.
But
we are never convincingly shown how this cold-blooded killing machine
gets the smell of death off his hands and becomes a human being. Nor
are we ever told why this reformed monster shouldn’t now be just
as worthy a prey for a Palestinian or a neo-Nazi hit man as the former
Nazi he once pursed.
If
this Israeli Robocop can somehow tap into his own humanity, isn’t
it also possible that the former Nazi officer could also have done the
same thing in the 60 years since the war ended?
-------------------------------------
William
Sternman's short stories have been published in England, Hungary, Pakistan,
South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Japan, as well as the U.S.
His book and movie reviews have appeared in Audience, Films in
Review, Bestsellers, The Drummer, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Houston
Chronicle, The Boston Herald, The St. Petersburg Times and www.movie-vault.com.
He has been a volunteer tutor at the Center for Literacy since 1998.
He received a fellowship grant in literature from the Pennsylvania Council
on the Arts.
©
2005 Me Three